These cases give quite in-depth coverage of a variety of Intellectual Property issues, including Trademark and Copyright Infringement, as well as Publicity Rights and Invasion of Privacy.
"Elvis" and "Elvis Presley" are registered trademarks with the USPTO. Should individuals be allowed to trademark their names? (Note: For more cases discussing Publicity Rights and Invasion of Privacy see the Property Cases.)
349 F.3d 622 (9th Cir.(Cal.), Nov 06, 2003)
357 F.3d 896 (9th Cir.(Cal.), Feb 06, 2004) (Amended Dissent)
Overview: Various copyright holders sue video company over unauthorized use of copyrighted material in exhaustive 16-hour video documentary of Elvis' life.
Elvis Presley Enterprises v. Capece
(The "Velvet Elvis" Case)
141 F.3d 188 (5th Cir.(Tex.), May 07, 1998)
950 F. Supp. 783, Dec 30, 1996 (District Court Opinion)
Overview: Assignee and registrant of all trademarks, copyrights, and publicity rights belonging to the Elvis Presley estate sues operators of "The Velvet Elvis" restaurant for trademark infringement and dilution, and violation of its right of publicity in the name of Elvis Presley. The District Court finds for Capece, reversed and remanded on appeal. Note: There is some wonderful Judicial Humor at the end of the 1996, District Court opinion!
Overview: Assignee of trademarks of Elvis Presley sues U.K. company selling Elvis Memorabilia for trademark infringement, violations of Tennessee common law, and statutory rights of publicity. Court finds in favor of plaintiff, EPE.
Elvis Presley Enterprises v. Elvisly Yours
(The British case)
(1999) R.P.C. 567 (Ct. of Appeal, March 12, 1999)
(1997) R.P.C. 543 (High Ct. of Justice, Chancery Div., March 18, 1997)
Overview: When a virtually identical case was held in the U.K., only this time with Elvisly Yours as plaintiff, the court ruled in favor of Elvisly Yours, unlike in the American case.
Estate of Elvis Presley v. Russen
(The "Big El Show" Case)
513 F. Supp. 1339 (D.N.J., Arp 16, 1981)
Overview: Estate of Elvis Presley sues Elvis impersonator for trademark infringement, common-law unfair competition, and infringement of right of publicity. This case has a long opinion and discusses the issues in great depth.
1993 WL 106894, 1993 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,060 (M.D.Fla., Jan 13, 1993)
Overview: Plaintiff songwriters and music publishers sue for copyright infringement by unlicensed public performance of copyrighted material in defendant's restaurant. Court discusses summary judgment issues.
(Vernon Presley, Executor of Elvis' Estate, co-defendant)
654 F.2d 11 (6th Cir.(Mich.), Jul 07, 1981)
Overview: Hoste, songwriter, seeks damages for copyright infringement, claiming Elvis performed a song almost identical to one that she wrote. Case deals with issues of summary judgment, statute of limitations, and laches defense.
Note: External hyperlinks are to free (non-subscription) sites wherever possible, though some may require registration. Judicial opinions available on PresLaw are PDF files and require Adobe Acrobat reader. All other links are to HTML pages unless stated otherwise.
PresLaw is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites that we have linked to.